CARDIOLOGY
Value of functional capacity assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery
Harbar Myroslava1, Makar Oksana2, Svitlyk Halyna3, Shatynska-Mytsyk Iryna3, Chngryan Gayane3, Siabrenko Genadii4
WJMI 2024; 4(1):13-16
Online publish date: 2024.04.27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13925407
Citation: Harbar, M., Makar, O., Svitlyk, H., Shatynska-Mytsyk, I., Chngryan, G., & Siabrenko, G. (2024). Value of functional capacity assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. World Journal of Medical Innovations, 4(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13925407
Affilations
1Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
2Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
3Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
4Kirovohrad regional clinical hospital for war veterans, Ukraine.
Corresponding author. Harbar Myroslava, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Pekarska str., 69, Lviv, 79019, +38(068)5002191, mharbar@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction. Functional capacity is important parameter of activity of a person. It can be assessed with different methods, including interviewing, walk tests, cardiopulmonary exercise testing. According to the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology, the assessment of functional capacity is an important step in the perioperative management of a patient with concomitant cardiovascular pathology during non-cardiac surgery. Purpose of our study was to implement assessing of functional capacity in clinical practice, including perioperative management of patients. And also, to compare the practical value of self-reported methods of assessing functional capacity and exercise testing. Materials and methods. 15 healthy men aged 33±5.4 years and 172 patients with documented pathology of the cardiovascular system aged 65±2.8 years were included in the study, among them 51% were male. We compared the value of different methods and the expediency of assessing the functional capacity of a patient with concomitant pathology of the cardiovascular system before planned non-cardiac surgery. Results. All healthy individuals gave a positive answer to the question about ability to climb two flights of stairs. The average Duke Activity Status Index score was 52.47±5.96, which corresponded to the calculated value of METs 9.19±0.73. During cardiopulmonary exercise testing, the average value of VO2max in these individuals was 47.56±11.34 mL/(kg·min). A direct strong correlation between Duke Activity Status Index values and VO2max was established (r=0.91, р˂0.01). 36 patients (21%) reported inability to climb two flights of stairs added. The average DASI in these persons was 12.84±4.38 and the level of NTproBNP was 1116±75. On the contrary in the rest of the patients the DASI was 28.18±7.72 and NTproBNP 302±42 with statistically significant difference (p˂0.01). The dynamics of troponins in the examined subjects did not show any increase in the postoperative period. The values of the EF in patients reported inability to climb two flights were lower by 9.78% compared with others (56.57±12.34% and 62.71±6.35%, p˂0.01). The average number of days spent in the hospital was 22 in patients with inability to climb two flights and 12 in the rest. 32 patients (19%) died, 28 deceased belonged to the group with inability to climb two flights of stairs. The average time of death was 29.86 days. Correlation analysis revealed a direct relationship of average strength between the Duke Activity Status Index and EF (0.42, p 0.007), an inverse relationship of average strength between the Duke Activity Status Index and NTproBNP (-0.42, p=0.01) and the number of days spent in a hospital (-0.39, p=0.005). In conclusion we found that healthy men with an active lifestyle have higher average VO2max parameters and confirmed that the VO2max obtained during the cardiopulmonary exercise testing was comparable to questionnaire methods for assessing functional capacity. One fifth of patients with confirmed cardiovascular pathology self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs. These individuals had a lower EF, a higher concentration of NTproBNP, a longer stay in the hospital, and significantly higher mortality. the Duke Activity Status Index correlates with left ventricular systolic function and NTproBNP level.
Introduction
Capacity is important parameter of activity of a person. It can be assessed with different methods, including interviewing, walk tests, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The last method consists in the computerized determination of the maximum oxygen consumption by the organism (VO2max) during physical exertion. It depends on two factors - the supply of O2 to the cell (pulmonary system function and respiration, cardiovascular system and blood circulation, musculoskeletal system,) and the utilization of O2 by mitochondria. Therefore, it decreases in pathological conditions, as well as physiologically with age.
The level of VO2max is used to examine athletes in order to determine the degree of their training and endurance, although it is also important in clinical practice. In 2016, the American Heart Association published a document recommending the determination of VO2max as a routine clinical sign among other “vital” measures, as lower VO2max levels have been found to be associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, overall mortality, and cancer mortality [1 7]. In addition, the American Heart Association recommends using VO2max levels to determine the level of physical activity and recommended loads in order to optimize the treatment of the patient and improve his health.
When conducting CPET for both clinical and sports examination, one principle is used - a gradual increase in the level of load on a treadmill or bicycle ergometer. During this, the concentration of oxygen and carbon dioxide in both inhaled and exhaled air is measured. VO2max is reached when oxygen consumption reaches a steady level (plateau) despite increasing workload [2 4]. In an untrained man, the value is in the range of 35–40 mL/(kg·min), in women - 27–31 mL/(kg·min), it can be improved by physical training. VO2max is highest in those sports where endurance plays a role - cyclists, rowers, skiers, swimmers, runners. Thus, male "elite runners" can reach a level of up to 85 mL/(kg·min), women - up to 77 mL/(kg·min). Five-time Tour de France champion Miguel Indurain had a documented VO2max value of 88.0 mL/(kg·min). Alpine skier Bjørn Dæhlie – 96 mL/(kg·min). The record value of VO2max was documented in Oskar Svendsen at the age of 18 - 97.5 mL/(kg·min). In thoroughbred horses, VO2max is 180 mL/(kg·min). Siberian dogs at the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race VO2max reaches 240 mL/(kg·min).
According to the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology, the assessment of functional capacity is an important step in the perioperative management of a patient with concomitant cardiovascular pathology during non-cardiac surgery (NCS) [3]. Reduced functional capacity is one of the prognostic markers of cardiac events and death in the postoperative period [4]. Self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs added incremental value to the 30-day cardiac event rate [4, 5]. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) had a more precise estimation of cardiac risk than subjectively assessed functional capacity [6]. CPET which allows to assess value of maximal oxygen consumption reflects exercise capacity, is the most precise test amongst the exercise assessments is the cardiopulmonary exercise test but did not predict 30-day mortality, post-operative MI, or cardiac arrest [3, 5, 6].
Objective
The purpose of our study was to implement assessing of functional capacity in clinical practice, including perioperative management of patients. And also to compare the practical value of self-reported methods of assessing functional capacity and exercise testing.
Materials and methods
Functional capacity was assessed in three ways: self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs, the Duke Activity Status Index, cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
The study consisted of two components:
1. Analysis of functional capacity of healthy persons with active lifestyle using Self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs, the DASI and CPET;
2. Analysis of functional capacity of patients with documented pathology of the cardiovascular system in preparation for planned non-cardiac surgery using Self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs and the DASI.
We compared the value of the methods and the expediency of assessing the functional capacity of a patient with concomitant pathology of the cardiovascular system before planned non-cardiac surgery.
15 healthy men aged 33±5.4 years and 172 patients with documented pathology of the cardiovascular system aged 65±2.8 years were included in the study, among them 51% were male. The level of natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) was determined in patients before surgery, and if it was elevated, a highly sensitive troponin test was performed postoperatively in dynamics according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on perioperative management. All patients underwent echocardiography with determination of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) using the Simpson method.
The duration of follow-up of patients was 6 months (inpatient visits or telephone visits).
Results
All healthy individuals gave a positive answer to the question about ability to climb two flights of stairs. The average DASI score was 52.47±5.96, which corresponded to the calculated value of METs 9.19±0.73. During CPET, the average value of VO2max in these individuals was 47.56±11.34 mL/(kg·min), and the performed load corresponded to 13.61±3.24 METs. A direct strong correlation between DASI values and VO2max was established (r=0.91, р˂0.01). It is noteworthy that the values of METs calculated and obtained by CPET differed from each other (results were higher during exercise stress testing), but there is a direct correlation between them (r=0.9, p˂0.01).
Upon admission to the hospital, 36 patients (21%) self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs added. On the basis of this, we divided patients into two groups - the first with self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs, the second included persons who can independently climb to the 2nd floor. The average DASI in the first group was 12.84±4.38, the calculated number of METs was 4.32±0.54, in the second group 28.18±7.72 and 6.25±0.95, respectively, the difference of both parameters between the groups was statistically significant (p˂0.01). The level of NTproBNP was 1116±75 in the first group and 302±42 in the second group (p 0.002). The dynamics of troponins in the examined subjects did not show any increase in the postoperative period. As expected, the average values of the EF in the first group were lower by 9.78% compared to the second group (56.57±12.34% and 62.71±6.35%, p˂0.01).
Among all the examined patients 32 (19%) died while 28 deceased belonged to the group of persons with reduced functional capacity. The average time of death was 29.86 days (minimum 11, maximum 67 days), four patients died in the interval between 90-120 days after the intervention. The average number of days spent in the hospital was 22 and 12 in patients of the first and second groups, respectively.
Correlation analysis revealed a direct relationship of average strength between DASI and EF (0.42, p 0.007), an inverse relationship of average strength between DASI and NTproBNP (-0.42, p=0.01) and the number of days spent in a hospital (-0.39, p=0.005).
Discussion
Exercise stress testing is a computerized method of determining VO2max. Even though the validity of interview-based assessment of functional capacity has been questioned [3], our study confirmed the results of a cohort study of high-risk patients undergoing NCS, which confirmed self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs added incremental value to the cardiac event ratio.
When assessing functional capacity using questionnaires, answers are self-reported they provide an estimate of functional capacity and may not be as accurate as objective measurements such as exercise stress testing. Criticism of CPET has been directed at both the difficulty of doing the test and the exorbitant cost [6]. Not all patients can undergo a stress test due to various reasons both from the patient's reasons, and from the medical system's side.
The correlation we proved between VO2max as computerized breath-by-breath analysis and interview-based assessment confirms that these methods are comparable in terms of assessing functional capacity [7]. The questionnaire method made it possible to identify persons
with reduced functional capacity. Therefore, the assessment of functional capacity by means of questionnaires is a sufficiently effective tool for both cardiologists and anesthesiologists to single out patients who will need more attention, a multidisciplinary consensus decision regarding preoperative preparation, and the type of anesthesiological support. The method does not require spending time, money, or special skills of the medical staff.
Conclusions
We found that healthy men with an active lifestyle have higher average VO2max parameters. We confirmed that the VO2max obtained during CPET was comparable to questionnaire methods for assessing functional capacity.
One fifth of patients with confirmed cardiovascular pathology self-reported inability to climb two flights of stairs. Actually, these individuals had a lower EF, a higher concentration of NTproBNP, a longer stay in the hospital, and significantly higher mortality. DASI correlates with left ventricular systolic function and NTproBNP level.
Limitations
This review is subject to certain limitations. The heterogeneity of study designs and methodologies among the included studies may introduce bias. Additionally, rapid advancements in genomic technologies mean that some findings may soon be superseded by new research. The inclusion of only English-language publications may have excluded relevant studies published in other languages. Furthermore, the varying quality of the included studies, despite the use of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessment, may affect the reliability of the conclusions drawn.
Future Directions
Future research should focus on integrating multi-omics data to capture the full complexity of UBC [106]. Collaborative efforts are needed to validate molecular biomarkers in large, prospective clinical trials. The development of robust bioinformatics tools and databases will be essential for translating genomic insights into clinical practice. Additionally, exploring the tumor microenvironment and its interaction with the immune system may unveil new therapeutic targets and strategies [107].
Conclusion
Genomic and transcriptomic studies have significantly advanced our understanding of UBC, offering opportunities for improved diagnostics, prognostication, and personalized treatment. The identification of key genetic alterations and molecular pathways has led to the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies tailored to individual patient profiles. Ongoing research and technological innovations promise to further enhance the management of UBC, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Reference List:
1. Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després J-P, Franklin BA et al. Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 134:e1-e47.
2. Serge CH, Pavan B, Paul CC, [et al.]. Prognostic Value of Functional Capacity in Different Exercise Protocols. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020;9:e015986.
3. Sigrun H, Julinda M, Salvatore C, [et al.]. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. European Heart Journal. 2022; Vol. 43:3826–3924.
4. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Hillis GS, Abbott TEF, [et al.]. Integration of the Duke Activity Status Index into preoperative risk evaluation: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:261–270.
5. Duminda NW. Preoperative Assessment of Functional Capacity: Looking beyond the Ability to Climb Stairs. Anesthesiology 2019, Vol. 131: 960–961.
6. Lurati B, Puelacher C, Menosi GD, [et al.]. Association between self-reported functional capacity and major adverse cardiac events in patients at elevated risk undergoing noncardiac surgery: a prospective diagnostic cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;126:102–110.
7. Wijeysundera DN, Pearse RM, Shulman MA, Abbott TEF, [et al.]. Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391:2631–2640.
8. B, Pieter EP. Preoperative Functional Evaluation of the Surgical Candidate in IASLC. Thoracic Oncology (Second Edition). 2018;265-273.e3.